There has been a lot written in the media recently about
Pope Francis and his thoughts on gay people. These thoughts came about due to
an interview the Pope had with a reporter on a plane as he was leaving world
youth day in Brazil. Many of the
international news reports (as usual) don’t deal with the real issue of the
interview. Instead, one line is taken out and promoted. Below is a working transcript of the question
about Monsignor Ricca and the supposed
gay lobby in the Vatican which the reporter asked:
The following is taken from the blog Salt and Light
Question: I would
like to ask permission to pose a rather delicate question. Another image
that went around the world is that of Monsignor Ricca and the news about his
personal life. I would like to know, your Holiness, what will be done
about this question. How should one deal with this question and how does
your Holiness wish to deal with the whole question of the gay lobby?
Answer: Regarding the matter of Monsignor Ricca, I did what
Canon Law required and did the required investigation. And from the
investigation, we did not find anything corresponding to the accusations
against him. We found none of that. That is the answer. But I
would like to add one more thing to this: I see that so many times in the Church,
apart from this case and also in this case, one looks for the “sins of
youth,” for example, is it not thus?, And then these things are
published. These things are not crimes. The crimes are something
else: child abuse is a crime. But sins, if a person, or secular priest or
a nun, has committed a sin and then that person experienced conversion, the
Lord forgives and when the Lord forgives, the Lord forgets and this is very
important for our lives. When we go to confession and we truly say “I
have sinned in this matter,” the Lord forgets and we do not have the right to
not forget because we run the risk that the Lord will not forget our sins,
eh? This is a danger. This is what is important: a theology of
sin. So many times I think of St. Peter: he committed one of the worst
sins denying Christ. And with this sin they made him Pope. We must
think about fact often.
But returning to your question more concretely: in this case
[Ricca] I did the required investigation and we found nothing. That is
the first question. Then you spoke of the gay lobby. Agh… so much
is written about the gay lobby. I have yet to find on a Vatican identity
card the word gay. They say there are some gay people here. I think
that when we encounter a gay person, we must make the distinction between the
fact of a person being gay and the fact of a lobby, because lobbies are not
good. They are bad. If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has
good will, who am I to judge that person? The Catechism of the Catholic
Church explains this point beautifully but says, wait a moment, how does it
say, it says, these persons must never be marginalized and “they must be
integrated into society.”
The problem is not that one has this tendency; no, we must
be brothers, this is the first matter. There is another problem, another
one: the problem is to form a lobby of those who have this tendency, a lobby of
the greedy people, a lobby of politicians, a lobby of Masons, so many
lobbies. This is the most serious problem for me. And thank you so much
for doing this question. Thank you very much!
No comments:
Post a Comment